Latest News
 Home
 Search
 Events
 News
 Blogs
21 CFR Part 11
Privacy Blog
 Research
Publications
Tech Reports
Presentations
Talks
Booklets
Software
 Library
21 CFR Part 11
Data Sources
StatsCan Docs
Privacy Links
Videos
 People
Staff
Awards
 Dashboard
Funding
Publications
Outreach
 Jobs
 About
Collaborations
Funding
Conflicts
Media


November 2007
Reflection Paper on Expectations for Electronic Source Documents Used in Clinical Trials (EMEA GCP Inspectors Working Group).






May 2007
Guidance for Industry: Computerized Systems Used in Clinical Investigations.






undated
Risk-Based Approach to 21 CFR Part 11.






May 2005
Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices.






November 2006
Leveraging the CDISC Standards to Facilitate the use of Electronic Source within Clinical Trials (Final).






September 2005
Leveraging the CDISC Standards to Facilitate the use of Electronic Source within Clinical Trials (Draft).






August 2003
Guidance for Industry: Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures - Scope and Application.






February 2003
Draft Guidance for Industry on 'Part 11, Electronic Records, Electronic Signatures - Scope and Application.






January 2002
General Principles of Software Validation; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff.






November 2000
Legal Considerations in Designing and Implementing Electronic Processes: A Guide for Federal Agencies.






October 2000
Records Management Guidance for Agencies Implementing Electronic Signature Technologies.






September 1999
Guidance for Industry, FDA Reviewers and Compliance on Off-The-Shelf Software use in Medical Devices.






April 1999
Guidance for Industry: Computerized Systems Used in Clinical Trials.






March 1997
Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures; Final Rule.







15 December 2008
A new tool has just been released by our lab that provides recommendations on geographic area size and re-identification risk (uniqueness). This expert system addresses a long standing problem in the privacy community about which areas to release data on.




14 December 2008
A recent article from our lab presents models that can be used to reason about geographic area size and re-identification risk. This provides an empirical basis for deciding whether an area is too small or not.




7 December 2008
Our de-identification technology is being showcased at the Privacy by Design Challenge, organized by the Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, on 28th January 2009 in Toronto. We will demonstrate the latest tools and case studies in de-identifying health data for secondary uses.



Copyright © 2005-2009 CHEO Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.
CHEO Research Institute, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8L1

This page last modified on:
Sat Jan 3 2009